Q1-Q7 Dimensional Analysis
Deep dive into each evaluation dimension for Visual Arts Department
Department Averages by Dimension
Q1: Clear Guidelines & Expectations
Course materials, syllabi, and expectations are well-defined
4.51avg score
Top Performers
Faculty Member 12: 5.00
Faculty Member 8: 5.00
Faculty Member 4: 5.00
Needs Improvement
Faculty Member 16: 2.52
Faculty Member 9: 3.33
Faculty Member 10: 4.00
Q2: Timely Grading
Assignments are graded and returned promptly with feedback
4.38avg score
Top Performers
Faculty Member 12: 5.00
Faculty Member 8: 5.00
Faculty Member 4: 5.00
Needs Improvement
Faculty Member 16: 2.77
Faculty Member 14: 3.64
Faculty Member 9: 3.67
Q3: Assessment Alignment
Assessments align with course objectives and content
4.58avg score
Top Performers
Faculty Member 12: 5.00
Faculty Member 8: 5.00
Faculty Member 4: 5.00
Needs Improvement
Faculty Member 16: 2.80
Faculty Member 9: 3.00
Faculty Member 10: 4.00
Q4: Active Participation
Students are engaged and encouraged to participate
4.53avg score
Top Performers
Faculty Member 12: 5.00
Faculty Member 8: 5.00
Faculty Member 4: 5.00
Needs Improvement
Faculty Member 16: 2.81
Faculty Member 9: 3.33
Faculty Member 17: 4.00
Q5: Timely Responses
Instructor responds to questions and concerns promptly
4.54avg score
Top Performers
Faculty Member 8: 5.00
Faculty Member 4: 5.00
Faculty Member 11: 5.00
Needs Improvement
Faculty Member 16: 2.75
Faculty Member 9: 3.67
Faculty Member 10: 4.00
Q6: Online Organization
Online course materials are well-organized (N/A for in-person)
4.48avg score
Top Performers
Faculty Member 12: 5.00
Faculty Member 8: 5.00
Faculty Member 4: 5.00
Needs Improvement
Faculty Member 16: 3.17
Faculty Member 9: 3.33
Faculty Member 21: 4.00
Q7: Teaching Methods
Instructor uses effective teaching methods
4.44avg score
Top Performers
Faculty Member 12: 5.00
Faculty Member 8: 5.00
Faculty Member 4: 5.00
Needs Improvement
Faculty Member 16: 1.81
Faculty Member 9: 3.33
Faculty Member 17: 3.67