Visual Arts Department

Course Evaluation Analysis

Fall 2025 • Yavapai College • Report Date: March 4, 2026

Department Chair: Lindsay Masten

4.49/5.00
Department Average
35.5%
Response Rate
45
Courses Analyzed
21
Faculty Evaluated

Excellence Highlights

  • 2 faculty members achieved perfect 5.00 scoresFaculty Member 8, Faculty Member 4
  • Top performer with significant response volumeFaculty Member 13 (4.86, 19 responses, 4 courses)
  • 62% of faculty perform at or above department average

Areas of Concern

  • Q2 (Timely Grading) identified as weakest dimension4.38 avg vs 4.49 dept avg
  • 2 faculty members in critical performance zone (<3.50)Faculty Member 9 (3.38), Faculty Member 16 (2.69)
  • 4 faculty significantly below department average4 faculty members identified

Faculty Performance Overview

All 21 instructors ranked by overall average score. Colors indicate performance tier. Dashed line shows department average (4.49).

Q-Dimension Performance Summary

Department averages across 7 evaluation dimensions. Q2 (Timely Grading) is the weakest dimension at 4.38, requiring department-wide attention.

Course Performance: Top 5 vs Bottom 5

Direct comparison of highest and lowest performing courses. Note the gap between top and bottom performers.

Top 5 Classes

Bottom 5 Classes

Strategic Recommendations

  1. 1Implement department-wide timely grading improvement initiative
  2. 2Leverage top performer's teaching methods as department model
  3. 3Provide intensive support for faculty in critical performance zone
  4. 4Establish peer mentoring program pairing top and struggling performers
  5. 5Standardize course expectations and curriculum across sections